Monthly Archives: February 2019

Dennis Prager and the UDC

(February 28, 2019) Although conservative talk show host, author and creator of the “Prager University” short-form political YouTube videos may be unaware of the United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC), both have been victimized by Wikipedia. Originally Prager was a donor to Wikipedia because he liked the the potential value an open sourced encyclopedia that might be self-correcting as the public edited articles to eliminate errors. But when he learned that the Wikipedia article about him was dominated by hostile writers he discontinued his financial support.

[Learn more about the Civil War & Reconstruction at My Amazon Author Page]

Specifically, when Prager inquired about a number of lies and misleading statements in the article he learned that Wikipedia allowed such accusations as long the cited source was a “respectable” third party. Thus, any Prager-hostile news organization, author or commentator could make untrue claims about Prager and have them repeated in the Wikipedia. Moreover, he has no power to deny the accusations within the article unless a “respectable” third party can be cited as reporting the denial.

Similarly the Wikipedia labels current members of the United Daughters of the Confederacy as racist. The claim is based upon the separate opinions of historian James McPherson and the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC). In response, the Daughters posted the following “Reaffirmation of Objectives” on the front page of their website:

[The UDC] will not associate with any individual, group or organization identified as being militant, unpatriotic, racist or subversive to the United States of America and its Flag.

Attempts to have the denial included in the Wikipedia have been rejected. Thus, today’s Daughters are denied the simple right of a falsely accused to at least say “not guilty.” Consequently, readers might construe the absence of a UDC denial to wrongly imply their agreement with the accusation.

Contrastingly, the Wikipedia articles on Jared Taylor and Richard Spencer quote both men as denying they are white supremacists. But Taylor is quoted as readily admitting he is a “white advocate” and Spencer as wanting America to become a “white ethnostate.” In contrast, the UDC’s denial is unqualified. Today’s Daughters have no desire for a “white ethnostate” nor are they advocates for any race: white, black or other.

The Wikipedia editors explain that they will not allow the UDC’s denial to be included because it has not been reported by a “respected” third party. Yet, it cannot be the fault of the UDC that “respected” news organizations have failed to report it because it has  been prominently displayed on the front page of the UDC website continuously for eighteen months.

In truth, the failure of “respected” writers to pick up the statement reveals their own bias and unworthiness to be characterized as “respected.” Similarly, the failure of the Wikipedia to include it is censorship that reveals a wicked agenda-driven bias.

Rescuing Old Joe

Whoever weds himself to the spirit of this age will find himself a widower in the next.    —   William Inge

Few realize that Florida was so committed to The War Between the States that she gave more soldiers to repel Northern invaders than she had registered voters. Gainesville was among the towns that responded. As a result, the local United Daughters of the Confederacy (UDC) chapter erected a statue of an ordinary infantryman in honor of the hometown boys who had fallen, including many buried anonymously far from home. When erected in 1904 most of the living veterans were in their sixties and seventies. In May 2017 the county commissioners voted to remove the monument, which had become fondly known to most residents during the previous 113 years as Old Joe.

After the vote one audience member raised her hand to ask a question. The Chair recognized Nansea Markham who is President of the local UDC chapter. She asked, “What will you do with the memorial?”

The county attorney explained that the statue would be sold at auction if it was worth over $2,000. Otherwise Joe would be scrapped.

Nansea stood and held an old document at shoulder height before saying, “I’m sorry. You cannot do that.” Motioning with the papers she added, “This is the original 1903 document pertinent to Old Joe’s legal status. It shows that he remains the property of the United Daughters of the Confederacy.”

The commissioners held an impromptu conference as the audience looked on. Afterward the Chair announced that the commission would give the UDC sixty days to accept the return of Old Joe. He added that if the offer was accepted the UDC would be responsible for all moving expenses and must complete the move within sixty days of acceptance. One commissioner that voted to remove the statue had previously announced that he would not allow the county to spend a single dime to move the memorial. He would rather it be destroyed.

Although Nansea was relieved for one last chance to save Old Joe her chapter had less than $1,000 in the bank. Given the security requirements and care required to safely relocate so old a structure, she worried that the task was too difficult. The next morning, however, she began to get supportive phone calls and emails. Many previously silent sympathizers recognized her from earlier Old Joe hearings before the commission and other local organizations during the preceding two years.

One phone call from a Vietnam vet lit a fire in her heart. He explained that the American soldier’s creed requires that a warrior “never leave a fallen comrade.” He told Nansea, “That’s how I see Old Joe’s situation. You are rescuing him. He is a veteran and I cannot leave him fallen on the ground to be scrapped.  I will send you money.” Realizing that many older Americans now cringe with shame at how they treated returning Vietnam vets in the 1960s and 70s, Nansea reasoned that the same might apply to Old Joe in the years ahead.

Thereafter she took every phone call and replied to every email. Many originated beyond Florida’s borders, including states above the Mason-Dixon Line. She took suggestions such as creating a FaceBook page and a GoFundMe Internet site. But she never directly asked for money. It started arriving anyway. She mobilized the UDC chapter members to send a hand-written “thank you” note to every donor. On July 20, 2017 she notified the county commission: “We [the UDC chapter] accept the Confederate Soldier Statue.”

Her laconic acceptance prompted repeated media inquiries that included national organizations such as The Washington Post and National Public Radio. She took the phone calls but politely declined to be interviewed or quoted. “Why?” asked one NPR reporter. “An interview would add publicity to help you raise money required to move the statue.”

“That’s true,” said Nansea, “but it might also attract unwanted attention. My job is to get Old Joe safely moved. I don’t want publicity that might trigger vandals.”

By mid-August the Gainesville UDC had raised $30,000 and secured a site for Old Joe on private property near a cemetery that contained the bodies of some Confederate veterans. The county attorney required Nansea to sign a twelve-page agreement that held the UDC chapter liable for any damages caused by Old Joe’s removal. Her group was also responsible for security in the event of interference from protestors.

Unfortunately, violent anti-Joe demonstrators were a genuine threat. They realized that the county government would not protect the memorial. As a result, they eagerly awaited the day of the move when they assumed the media would be present. But Nansea fooled them. In the days leading up to the move she organized theatrics in which volunteers pretended to be dissembling Old Joe but did little actual work. Rain arrived on the true moving day. It was enough to keep the protestors away until the moving crew was ready to drive off.

Although a dubious zeitgeist drove Old Joe from public property, his valor remains intact. The Kirby Smith Chapter of the United Daughters of the Confederacy rescued it.

[Learn about Civil War & Reconstruction at My Amazon Author Page]