The Immorality of Destroying Confederate Statues

(December 23, 2018) The destruction of Confederate statues and prohibitions on the display of her symbols is a type of censorship. Like all censors the perpetrators argue that they are abolishing an immorality. But the true target of censorship is always an inconvenient truth, not a falsehood.

[Learn more about Civil War and Reconstruction at My Amazon Author Page]

For the past forty years nearly all academic Civil War era historians have focused on the evils of slavery in order to condemn the South, and excuse the North, for the war and the stubborn racism that lingered long afterward. They feel duty-bound to debunk suggestions that Southerners could have had any moral reason to fight or resist Radical Republican Reconstruction. Contrary narratives are dismissed as unworthy of debate. Instead all are labeled “Lost Cause Mythology” that must be censored, by cultural condemnation if not yet by official government interdiction. Censorship is rationalized as a way to protect society from immorality.

Stone Mountain Georgia

The logical case against censorship is that it empowers a minority to deny everyone else the opportunity to think for ourselves. We are implicitly told that we are incapable of judging facts and interpretations that are contrary to the favored narrative. But if we are not permitted to think for ourselves, we cannot be logical.

Historians urge the banning of Confederate symbols by claiming the moral high ground against those they label as “Lost Cause Mythologists” or “Neo-Confederates.” Yet opponents should not yield that ground because what the historians are doing is itself basically immoral. They are restricting our freedom. They appoint themselves as the only qualified judges of morality and immorality. While the logical case is the foundational argument against censorship the moral case merits more emphasis in public discussion. Historians should not be allowed to dictate our thoughts. Moreover, censorship gags not only those wanting to express themselves but also everyone who might otherwise read, look at, or listen to them.

6 thoughts on “The Immorality of Destroying Confederate Statues

  1. Harris Syed

    Phil, considering your usage of the term “Pious Cause” or “Righteous Cause” what sources do you even have for anyone (outside of you) using it. Not disagreeing just kindly asking.

      1. cassandra41

        I’m sorry, but pointing out that immoral people full of hate are doing something immoral is redundant. In other words, it isn’t as if these barbarians were simply ignorant or mistaken. To accuse them of immorality is, as noted, redundant. Pretty much everything that they do is immoral. Where it is necessary to point out immorality or wrongdoing is not with the vandals but with those supposedly decent people who remain silent in the face of vandalism.

  2. Pingback: The Immorality Of Destroying Confederate Statues – Dixie Outfitters

  3. Michael Hutson

    It is the Yankee 150+ year whitewash campaign of the trampling the Constitution and ignoring the atrocities and war crimes visited upon the South, all in the convenient anime of something as altruistic as “freeing the slaves”– good cover for economic war, undeclared, but war nevertheless.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.